There are certain "Wow" moments in the education of a mathematics student. For me, they include Cantor's discovery of different levels of infinity, Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, and the Lancaster War Model. But on most student's list will be the Taylor Series.
Geometry and ArithmeticTo see that a geometric quantity (the sine of an angle of a right triangle), the ratio of two lengths, can be calculated with an arithmetic formula is astounding. And to implement this formula with only a few lines of computer code boggles. It is then tempting to assume that this is how your calculator does its calculations. And it probably would be except for one fact; your calculator is dumb.
Addition is easy, Multiplication is HardSince a calculator at its core uses binary arithmetic, it can easily do addition. You probably learned how to do it grade school. But multiplication is harder, with one exception. It is easy to multiply by 2 (10 in binary). Let's look at a simple example, 5 x 2 = 10. In binary, it is 101 x 10 = 1010. To multiply a binary number by 2, all you need do is shift the digits to the left, and shifting bits is very easy for a calculator's CPU to do.
The problem with using the Taylor series is that calculating just the first 5 terms of the sine expansion requires more than 50 multiplications and divisions. However, there are other ways of calculating the sine of an angle that, while harder for humans to do, are easier for computers.
COordinate Rotation DIgital ComputerAn alternate method of calculating sine (and other transcendental functions) was developed in the 1960's that uses multiplications and divisions by 2. The details are beyond the scope of this post but can be found using the links below. At its heart is the decomposition of the angle into the sum of a set of specific angles.
Past threads on Graph-TI asked about the internal methods used to compute trigonometric and other transcendental functions. We wanted to add some specific information to this dialog so that someone could perhaps develop a short module for the classroom if they would like. This topic should be interesting for background on calculators or as a good example of a math application. Most practical algorithms in use for transcendental functions are either polynomial approximations or the CORDIC method. TI calculators have almost always used CORDIC, the exceptions being the CC-40, TI-74 and TI-95 which used polynomial approximations. In the PC world, the popular Intel math coprocessors like the 8087 use CORDIC methods, while the Cyrix 83D87 uses polynomial methods. There are pros and cons to both methods.
The details of CORDIC can be found at various sites with a few below.
LinksA paper on the CORDIC algorithm for the general student (from the site that hosts WinPlot which was used to generate the opening graphic)
A paper from the Texas Instruments Calculator division about how their calculators use CORDIC
How CORDIC was implemented on the HP-35 with details on the bit-shifting operation
The ubiquitous Wikipedia entry